In a landmark ruling, the Federal High Court in Abuja has overturned the directive of Governor Abba Yusuf of Kano State, relating to the alleged murder case involving Rep Alhassan Doguwa (APC-Kano), and has ordered the payment of N25 million in damages.
Mr. Doguwa, the representative of Doguwa/Tundun Wada Federal Constituency of Kano State, was arrested on February 28 at the Mallam Aminu Kano International Airport while boarding a flight to Abuja. The police had accused him of leading thugs to set ablaze the secretariat of the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) in Kano, an incident in which two individuals reportedly lost their lives. Despite denying any wrongdoing, Doguwa was arraigned in March at a magistrate court in Kano and remanded in prison. He was later granted bail by a Federal High Court in Kano after the charges were withdrawn due to insufficient evidence linking him to the alleged offenses.
Subsequently, the lawmaker filed a lawsuit seeking to enforce his fundamental rights amidst concerns of a potential re-arrest. The suit named the Attorney-General of the Federation, the Inspector-General of Police, the Executive Governor of Kano State, and the State Attorney-General as defendants.
Justice Donatus Okorowo has now ruled in favor of Mr. Doguwa, denouncing the governor’s attempt to review the legal advice and ordering an end to any interference with the legislator’s fundamental rights. The judge also awarded N25 million in damages against Governor Yusuf, citing the psychological pain and damage inflicted upon Mr. Doguwa.
The ruling marks a significant turning point in a case that has raised considerable public interest, with implications for the protection of individual rights and the exercise of governmental authority. Justice Okorowo’s decision serves as a resounding affirmation of the constitutional rights to human dignity, personal liberty, and freedom of movement.
This judgement sends a clear message about the importance of upholding the rule of law and preventing unconstitutional actions from infringing upon the fundamental rights of individuals. It stands as a testament to the judiciary’s commitment to safeguarding the rights and liberties of citizens, regardless of their status or position.
The outcome of this case reverberates beyond its immediate legal implications, resonating as a beacon of hope for the protection of citizens’ rights in an evolving society. As the global community continues its quest for justice and equity, this ruling epitomizes the unwavering resolve to uphold the principles of fairness and justice, transcending geographical boundaries and embodying the universal pursuit of righteousness and equality.
NAN
