In a groundbreaking move, Siddig Osman recently announced the establishment of a civilian administration in Jazeera State, comprising 31 members selected to represent the state’s villages and cities, with Osman himself elected as chairman. The formation of this administration, aimed at safeguarding civilians and ensuring a stable supply of food and medication, was the result of a 100+ local council election. Osman called on former state employees to return to their duties and appealed to the international community for humanitarian aid and financial support.
Osman, a member of the National Umma Party, credited the citizens of Jazeera State for the concept of the administration, which received support from the leaders of the Rapid Forces. Despite this positive development, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have continued to launch attacks on local civilians, resulting in the deaths of at least 248 individuals and injuries to 347 others in Jazeera State since the conflict began. The RSF’s actions have also led to the prevention of farming activities, causing farmers to face starvation as their crops are looted.
Furthermore, reports indicate that the RSF and affiliated militias have committed 43 cases of rape in the state, with concerns raised about the accuracy of these figures due to limited access and an Internet blackout. Despite these challenges, activists like Yousra Ahmed remain hopeful that communication channels with the new administration can be established to advocate for peace and human rights.
However, the RSF’s continued targeting of civilians has drawn criticism from various groups, including the Umma Party, which has denounced any involvement in the RSF-appointed government in Jazeera State. The Wad Medani Resistance Committee has also rejected the legitimacy of government institutions established by the RSF, citing concerns about their actions and lack of control.
As the situation in Jazeera State remains volatile, with over 555,000 people displaced as of late March 2024, the future of the civil-led administration under the RSF remains uncertain. While there is hope for improved communication and services for the public, many residents are wary of the RSF’s ability to govern effectively given their track record of violence and instability.
