Nairobi, Kenya — May 30, 2024
Kenyan President William Ruto has defended his decision to use a private plane for a recent trip to the United States, a move that has sparked controversy and public scrutiny. Speaking at a National Prayer Breakfast in Nairobi, Ruto addressed critics by disclosing that the private plane cost approximately 10 million shillings ($73,000), a rate he described as a discount offered by “some friends.” He emphasized that this was more economical than using the national airline, Kenya Airways, which he had initially planned to book.
Addressing the Critics
Ruto dismissed claims that the trip cost $1.5 million, calling such figures exaggerated. He assured the public that he would not squander taxpayers’ money. “I lead by example in cutting costs,” Ruto said, urging critics to “relax” and trust his administration’s fiscal responsibility.
Securing Investment Deals
During his three-day official visit to the US, Kenya secured significant investment deals worth billions of dollars. One of the highlights of the trip was the announcement by US Vice President Kamala Harris of a new partnership aimed at increasing internet access across Africa. The initiative, part of the Partnership for Digital Access in Africa, aims to boost internet connectivity to 80% of the continent by 2030, up from the current 40%.
In addition to this, Harris introduced an initiative designed to provide 100 million Africans in the agricultural sector with access to the digital economy. These announcements marked significant steps toward enhancing digital infrastructure and economic opportunities in Africa.
Public Reaction and Ongoing Questions
Despite these achievements, questions persist about the propriety of accepting the discounted rate from friends for the private jet. Some Kenyans, including social media users like Karani Mutonga and Mwangi Maina, have demanded transparency regarding these friends and their potential motives. There are concerns about the geopolitical implications of such offers and the need for clear ethical guidelines.
This controversy arises amid broader criticism of Ruto’s government for perceived extravagance, especially in the context of rising taxes and public dissatisfaction since he took office in 2022. The debate over the cost of the US trip reflects ongoing tensions about government spending and accountability.
Conclusion
As President Ruto continues to navigate these criticisms, his administration’s ability to balance fiscal prudence with effective governance will remain under scrutiny. The outcomes of the US trip, particularly the investment deals and digital initiatives, will be key factors in assessing the trip’s overall impact and the justification for its costs.
