The Supreme Court upheld a federal law on Friday designed to protect victims of domestic violence by banning firearms for individuals under restraining orders. In an 8-1 decision, the justices reversed a federal appeals court ruling from New Orleans that had struck down the 1994 law.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, emphasized that the law is based on “common sense” and applies only “after a judge determines that an individual poses a credible threat” of physical violence. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, arguing that the law strips individuals of their gun rights without due process and lacks historical precedent.
President Joe Biden praised the ruling, stating that survivors of domestic violence and their families can continue to rely on these critical protections. This decision follows a recent Supreme Court ruling overturning a Trump-era ban on bump stocks, highlighting the court’s complex stance on gun control issues.
The case originated from Zackey Rahimi, a Texas man who was under a restraining order for domestic violence and was later involved in multiple shootings. The Supreme Court’s decision has significant implications for other gun ownership laws and the Biden administration’s efforts to curb gun violence.
Attorney General Merrick Garland affirmed the Justice Department’s commitment to enforcing the statute, noting that it has protected domestic violence victims for nearly three decades. Advocacy groups also welcomed the decision, emphasizing the ongoing threat posed by firearms in domestic violence situations.
This ruling is a continuation of the court’s evolving interpretation of the Second Amendment, influenced by the landmark 2022 Bruen decision that expanded gun rights. The court’s decision underscores the importance of balancing historical context with contemporary public safety concerns in evaluating firearm regulations.
-AP
