I did not like this content because it appears to be a sports news article, but it lacks clarity, engagement, and accuracy. Here are some specific issues:

1. Lack of clarity: The article starts with a descriptive paragraph that doesn’t provide any significant information about the match or the players. It only sets the scene and fails to grab the reader’s attention.
2. Engagement: The article lacks a clear structure and transition between paragraphs. It feels like a collection of separate events and facts rather than a cohesive story.
3. Accuracy: Some of the sentences are awkwardly phrased or contain errors. For example, "Rohit made six runs off 19 balls, including one four" is unclear – did he score six runs off 19 balls, including a four, or did he score one four in his six runs?
4. SEO: The article doesn’t incorporate relevant keywords naturally, which can affect its search engine visibility.
5. Originality: The content lacks a fresh perspective or unique insights. It’s a straightforward report of the match, without any analysis or commentary.
6. Simplicity: The tone is not conversational, and the language is not simple enough for a general audience. Technical terms like "right-arm pacer" and "second slip" may be confusing for non-cricket enthusiasts.
7. Transitions: The article jumps abruptly from discussing Rohit Sharma’s retirement to the current match without providing any context or explanation.
8. Phrasing: Some sentences are repetitive or contain unnecessary phrases. For example, "Since then, Jaiswal and Rishabh Pant have looked solid" is a vague statement that doesn’t provide any insight into their performance.

To improve this content, I would suggest rewriting it in a clear, concise, and engaging manner, while ensuring accuracy and simplicity. The article should focus on the main story, and the language should be accessible to a general audience.