In a significant and controversial decision, South Carolina executed inmate Richard Moore by lethal injection on Friday, following widespread appeals for mercy that ultimately went unanswered. Moore was sentenced to death for the 1999 murder of 42-year-old James Mahoney during a robbery at a Spartanburg convenience store.

According to Chrysti Shain of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, Moore’s conviction stemmed from a violent encounter that began when he entered the store unarmed. During the incident, Mahoney, the clerk, pulled a gun on Moore, who managed to wrestle it away. In the ensuing struggle, both men were shot—Moore in the arm and Mahoney fatally in the chest.

Moore’s legal team argued that he was acting in self-defense and pointed out that no one in South Carolina had been executed in the past 50 years for a robbery that started unarmed and without the intention to kill. They highlighted the racial disparities in Moore’s case, noting that he, a Black man, was the only inmate on the state’s death row convicted by an all-white jury.

In their pleas for clemency, Moore’s attorneys requested Governor Henry McMaster to commute his sentence to life without the possibility of parole, citing his exemplary prison record and his commitment to mentoring other inmates. However, McMaster declined to grant clemency, providing no explanation for his decision.

Moore’s execution raises further questions about the death penalty in the United States, particularly in South Carolina, where executions had not occurred in 13 years prior to this case. The state resumed executions last month amid growing opposition to capital punishment. Moore’s case has sparked renewed discussions about the fairness and morality of the death penalty, especially regarding its application in racially charged contexts.