Nigeria’s Presidential Spokesperson Urges Atiku Abubakar to Accept Fate and Collaborate with Government
In a recent interview on TVC, Daniel Bwala, Special Adviser to President Bola Tinubu on policy communication, sparked a significant conversation when he suggested that it may not be God’s will for former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar to become the President of Nigeria. Bwala’s statement comes as the Nigerian political landscape continues to evolve, with a wave of defections from opposition parties to the All Progressives Congress (APC).
Bwala advised Atiku to accept reality and work with President Tinubu to build a better future for Nigeria. He emphasized the importance of believing in destiny and the will of God, stating, "God gives power to whomsoever He chooses. And it seems from the facts on the ground that it may not have been the will of God for you to govern Nigeria." This remarks underscores the complexities of Nigerian politics, where religion and fate often play significant roles in shaping public discourse.
The Presidential aide encouraged Atiku to consider aligning himself with the current administration, highlighting the potential for a lasting legacy, "even if it is realised through another person." Bwala noted that Atiku’s contribution to the country’s development could be invaluable, especially given his long-standing friendship with President Tinubu. He suggested that by working together, they could achieve their shared vision for Nigeria, stating, "Your legacy will be that in your political dying days, you will be able to achieve some of your dreams, albeit through your friend."
However, Bwala also cautioned Atiku that if he insists on running for president, his political ending might not be as favorable as he anticipates. This warning is particularly pertinent in light of the significant defections from Atiku’s political camp, with an estimated 60 to 70 percent of his supporters having already abandoned him. Younger politicians who once backed Atiku are now seeking power in their own right, signaling a shift in the country’s political dynamics.
Atiku’s own uncertainty about contesting the 2027 presidency, expressed in March, adds to the intrigue. His condition for running – the need for a viable platform – may become increasingly challenging to fulfill, given the current exodus of supporters to the APC. As the Nigerian political scene continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the road to the presidency will be paved with strategic alliances, divine providence, and the will of the people.
In conclusion, Bwala’s remarks serve as a reminder that in Nigerian politics, the lines between fate, faith, and ambition are often blurred. As the country navigates its complex political landscape, one thing is certain – the future of Nigeria’s leadership will be shaped by a delicate balance of power, persuasion, and providence.
