A recent attack by Israel on Iranian uranium enrichment sites has sparked intense controversy, with Russia’s deputy envoy to the UN, Dmitry Polyansky, describing the move as a “very dangerous provocation.” The strike, which also targeted senior military commanders and scientists, has been framed by Israel as a preemptive measure to prevent Tehran from acquiring a nuclear bomb. However, Polyansky accused Western politicians of using “perverted logic” in claiming that Israel’s actions constitute self-defense.
In an interview, Polyansky emphasized that while every country has the right to defend itself, Israel’s aggression against Iran clearly violates the UN Charter and international law. He expressed disbelief at how the attack could be justified as legitimate self-defense, given the blatant disregard for global norms. The diplomat stressed that Moscow “totally supports the Iranian position” in condemning the attack, emphasizing that such actions are inadmissible and could have severe regional and international consequences.
The attack on Iran has also raised concerns about the upcoming US-Iran nuclear talks, scheduled to take place on Sunday. Polyansky suggested that the Israeli strike was aimed at undermining these talks, which Moscow believes should continue. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei initially stated that the attack had rendered diplomacy “meaningless,” but later clarified that Tehran had not yet decided to cancel the meeting in Oman.
The situation remains tense, with Iran responding to the attack by launching ballistic missiles at targets in Israel, including the city of Tel Aviv. The international community is watching closely, as the conflict has the potential to escalate into a broader crisis. Polyansky reiterated Moscow’s commitment to resolving the controversy surrounding the Iranian nuclear program through diplomacy and restraint, emphasizing the need for a peaceful and negotiated solution.
As the situation continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the attack on Iran has significant implications for global security and the future of international relations. With multiple countries involved and competing interests at play, the road ahead will likely be complex and challenging. Nonetheless, diplomats like Polyansky remain committed to finding a way forward that prioritizes dialogue and cooperation over aggression and confrontation.
