The family of Bilyaminu Bello, who was murdered by his wife Maryam Sanda, has expressed outrage over the presidential clemency granted to her. Maryam Sanda was among 175 inmates pardoned by President Bola Tinubu under the Prerogative of Mercy initiative. This decision has sparked widespread criticism, particularly due to the high-profile nature of the case, which had become a symbol of justice for victims of domestic violence.
The Bello family released a statement describing the pardon as “the worst possible injustice any family could be made to go through.” They stated that the decision represents “a cruel reopening of healing wounds” and a “grave injustice to the memory of their loved one.” The family noted that Maryam Sanda had shown no remorse throughout the ordeal. The pardon, they claim, has reopened the wounds of the grieving family, who had found some closure after the court’s verdict.
The family expressed disappointment that the Federal Government chose to extend clemency to Maryam Sanda, reportedly following appeals from her family. They interpret this decision as driven by the motivation to appease Maryam’s family, while ignoring the pain inflicted on the victim’s loved ones. The Bello family accused the government of undermining the judicial process and disregarding the feelings of the deceased’s loved ones.
The family emphasized that their late son was a cherished family member, profoundly loved and deeply mourned by relations, friends, and associates following the gruesome murder eight years ago. They condemned the emotional manipulation surrounding Maryam Sanda’s release, noting that she had denied her children the opportunity to know their father’s love and care.
The presidential clemency has significant implications, as it raises questions about the effectiveness of the justice system in addressing domestic violence cases. The Bello family’s statement serves as a reminder of the importance of considering the feelings and rights of victims’ families in such cases. As the family takes solace in divine justice, the incident highlights the need for a thorough review of the Prerogative of Mercy initiative and its application in high-profile cases.
