The Federal High Court in Abuja has set November 20 as the date for judgment in the trial of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, on charges of terrorism. This development comes after Kanu’s defense was foreclosed due to his refusal to enter a defense under a law that has been repealed.

According to Justice Binta Nyako, who presided over the case, the court had provided Kanu with the opportunity to defend himself as required by the constitution under Section 36. However, Kanu’s insistence on not proceeding under the repealed law led the court to conclude that he had waived his right to a defense. The judge stated, “This court has given opportunity to the defendant under Section 36 as required by the constitution, and I will not allow this to continue.”

Kanu is facing trial on allegations of terrorism, which is a serious offense under Nigerian law. The case has garnered significant attention due to the sensitive nature of the charges and the controversy surrounding the Indigenous People of Biafra, a group that has been proscribed by the Nigerian government.

The trial has been ongoing, with the prosecution presenting its case against Kanu. The defense’s decision not to proceed under the repealed law has effectively closed their case, paving the way for the court to deliver its judgment. The November 20 judgment date sets the stage for the culmination of the trial, which will determine Kanu’s fate.

The case has significant implications for the rule of law and the administration of justice in Nigeria. The judgment will be closely watched by human rights organizations, legal experts, and the international community, who are interested in seeing how the Nigerian judiciary handles high-profile cases involving sensitive political and security issues. As the court prepares to deliver its verdict, all eyes will be on the Federal High Court in Abuja, awaiting the outcome of this closely watched trial.