A former gubernatorial candidate in Nigeria’s Cross River State, Effiong Nyong, has voiced concerns about the region’s democratic process. Running on the African Democratic Congress (ADC) ticket, Nyong alleges that elections in the state are often reduced to a “selection” process rather than a genuinely democratic exercise. He argues that the electoral system is flawed, with individuals being “programmed” to support particular candidates, thereby undermining the principles of free and fair elections that are essential for a healthy democracy. His comments suggest a political landscape marked by a lack of transparency and accountability.
Nyong also criticized the current administration’s handling of the state’s power infrastructure. He recalled that a 23‑megawatt power plant was constructed in Calabar during the tenure of former governor Prof. Ben Ayade to provide reliable electricity to the city and surrounding areas. According to Nyong, the present government has allowed the plant to deteriorate instead of upgrading it to run on gas.
In addition, Nyong expressed concerns about the administration’s approach to governance, noting a lack of emphasis on competence and technical capacity in appointments. He criticized the government’s control over funds allocated to local government areas, arguing that this hampers development at the grassroots level. Local government chairmen, he says, must obtain state approval before spending funds, limiting their ability to undertake even basic tasks.
The former candidate highlighted the poor state of roads in Cross River, warning that this could deter tourists and hinder participation in major events such as the Christmas carnival. He observed that neighboring Akwa Ibom State has begun to replicate events that were previously unique to Cross River, potentially further undermining the state’s reputation as a tourist destination.
Nyong’s remarks underscore the need for reforms in Cross River’s electoral system and governance structure. The issues he raised have significant implications for the state’s development, investment prospects, and tourism potential. As the state continues to grapple with these challenges, it remains to be seen how the government will respond and work toward a more transparent and accountable system.
Comments are closed for this story.