The White House has sparked controversy after posting a video on its X account featuring migrants being arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, set to Sabrina Carpenter’s song “Juno”. The singer responded swiftly, condemning the video as “evil” and “inhumane” and urging the White House not to use her music to promote its agenda.

This incident is not an isolated one, as politicians, particularly former President Donald Trump, have a history of using musicians’ work without their permission. There have been numerous instances where artists have publicly objected to the use of their music by Trump and his associates.

The White House has a track record of sharing memes, AI-generated content, and viral social videos that have been criticized for dehumanizing undocumented immigrants. The use of Carpenter’s song in the ICE video has been seen as a deliberate attempt to provoke a reaction and create a viral moment.

Carpenter’s song “Juno” has previously gone viral, featuring prominently in her “Short n’Sweet” tour. The White House’s appropriation of the song’s lyrics, “Have you ever tried this one?”, has been met with widespread criticism.

In response to Carpenter’s criticism, a White House spokesperson provided a statement to Fox News Digital, defending the administration’s immigration policies and implying that those who object to them are misguided.

The controversy highlights the ongoing debate over immigration policies and the use of social media by politicians to shape public opinion. The incident also raises questions about the use of intellectual property, particularly music, in political contexts without the consent of the artists.

The White House’s social media strategy has been criticized for promoting divisive content, and this latest incident is likely to fuel further controversy. As the debate over immigration policies continues, it remains to be seen how the White House will respond to criticism from artists and other stakeholders.