Trump prompts Europe to boost defense spending says NATO chief

NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has stated that European countries should be grateful for the presidency of Donald Trump, as his pressure has prompted the continent to increase its defense spending. Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Rutte argued that Trump’s influence has forced European nations to take greater responsibility for their own defense.

Rutte’s comments come amidst ongoing tensions between the US and European NATO members over Trump’s attempts to acquire Greenland, an autonomous Danish Arctic territory. The dispute has led to a rift between the US and several European countries, with Trump threatening tariffs on eight NATO members who opposed his efforts.

Despite the controversy, Rutte believes that Trump’s push for increased defense spending has been beneficial for Europe. He noted that without Trump, European economies such as Spain, Italy, and France may not have agreed to allocate 2% of their GDP to defense, a target set by NATO. Rutte added that the bloc has since agreed to a new target of 5% of GDP by 2035, a demand originally raised by Trump.

Rutte’s approach to Trump has drawn criticism, with some accusing him of being too lenient with the US president. A private message from Rutte to Trump, in which he pledged to help “find a way forward” on Greenland, was recently made public, prompting French MEP Nathalie Loiseau to brand Rutte a “groveling” leader.

The dispute over Greenland has significant implications for the relationship between the US and European NATO members. Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever has suggested that Europe must now choose between maintaining its “self-respect” and being a “miserable slave” to the US, warning that the choice could mark “the end of an era of 80 years of Atlantism.”

The situation remains unresolved, with Trump claiming that a framework for a deal on Greenland is being considered. As the standoff continues, European leaders will be closely watching the developments, weighing the benefits of increased defense spending against the potential costs of strained relations with the US. The outcome of this dispute will have significant implications for the future of NATO and the transatlantic alliance.