The interim national chairman of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), former Senate President David Mark, has rebuked Senate President Godswill Akpabio for commenting on the technical capacity of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) regarding electronic transmission of election results.
Akpabio had recently defended the Senate’s rejection of a mandatory electronic transmission provision, citing inadequate network coverage in nine states. Responding to these remarks in Abuja, Mark asserted that the legislature’s role is to enact laws, not interpret INEC’s operational capabilities.
“What the ADC is saying is, pass the law, and there should be electronic transmission. Let INEC decide whether they can do it or not,” Mark stated. “Don’t speak for INEC. Speak for the National Assembly. What the public wants is let there be electronic transmission. Now if INEC cannot do it, it’s their own problem and not for you to speak for INEC.”
The debate centers on a contentious clause in Nigeria’s electoral amendment process. Proponents argue electronic transmission enhances transparency and reduces result manipulation, a demand amplified by public trust deficits following past elections. Opponents, including some lawmakers, point to infrastructure gaps, particularly in remote areas, as a prohibitive challenge.
INEC has historically advocated for technological interoperability but maintains it does not set legislative standards. The commission previously piloted limited electronic transmission during by-elections, highlighting both potential and persistent logistical hurdles.
Mark’s intervention underscores a recurring tension between Nigeria’s legislature and its electoral body. His position aligns with civil society and major political parties demanding swift passage of the amendment to mandate electronic transmission for future polls, including the 2027 general election.
The disagreement reflects deeper questions about INEC’s autonomy and the National Assembly’s role in shaping electoral integrity. With the amendment stalled, the path to modernizing Nigeria’s voting process remains uncertain, dependent on whether lawmakers prioritize public demand for technological reforms or concerns over infrastructural readiness.
