Justice Recuses Herself in Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial Over Confidence Crisis

A High-Stakes Drama in Abuja: Judge Recuses Herself from Kanu’s Terrorism Trial Amid Uproar

Justice Binta Nyako, a judge of the Federal High Court in Abuja, has recused herself from the trial of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), who is facing terrorism charges brought by the Nigerian federal government. This unexpected turn of events comes after Kanu expressed a lack of confidence and trust in the judge during the trial on Tuesday.

In a dramatic outburst, Kanu jumped up from the dock and ordered his lawyer, Aloy Ejimako, to take a seat so he could address the court. Kanu then announced that he no longer had faith in Justice Nyako and demanded that she recuse herself immediately. Despite objections from the federal government’s lawyer, Adegboyega Awomolo, the judge insisted on stepping down from the case.

The development was met with resistance from Awomolo, who argued that the court’s order to open the trial was in line with a Supreme Court judgment. However, Justice Nyako maintained that she would prefer another judge to handle the trial. Following her decision, the judge ordered that the case file be returned to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, John Tsoho, for reassignment to another judge.

Kanu, who was previously held in custody, has now been returned to the Department of State Services (DSS) custody. It remains to be seen which judge will take over the trial and what the implications of this development will be for Kanu’s legal battle.

As the legal battle continues, this shocking turn of events has once again brought international attention to the case of Nnamdi Kanu and the Indigenous People of Biafra.