Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, reiterated his commitment to supporting President Bola Tinubu and stressed the importance of honoring political agreements. During a visit to Rivers State, he attended a public function and an end‑of‑year thanksgiving service in Ochigba, Ahoada East Local Government Area, where he addressed stakeholders and top political figures.
Wike recalled his open support for Tinubu during the 2023 presidential election, noting that it was politically risky in the state at the time. He said his backing was driven by conviction rather than convenience and warned that loyalty shown during critical periods should not be forgotten. The minister criticized some political actors in Rivers State for opportunistic loyalty, pointing out that many who now publicly support the President remained silent before the election. He emphasized that consistency and respect for agreements are central to his political philosophy and cautioned that betrayal of political understandings can fuel instability.
After the event, Wike proceeded to the Rivers State Assembly Quarters, where he was received by Speaker Martin Amaewhule. The Speaker thanked him for his continued support of the Assembly, describing his role as crucial for legislative stability. Wike praised the lawmakers for adhering to the terms of an existing peace agreement in the state but condemned external political interests that seek to benefit from Rivers State without regard for its people. He accused these actors of exploiting the state’s resources while stoking internal divisions.
The minister disclosed that active political engagements would resume in January next year and affirmed that his camp would not shy away from political contestation. Wike’s visit highlighted ongoing political alliances in Rivers State, while his comments raised questions about the sustainability of the fragile peace currently holding there. His emphasis on honoring agreements and criticism of opportunistic loyalty underscore the complexities of the state’s political landscape, leaving it to be seen whether the peace agreement can be maintained and how the upcoming political engagements will shape the state’s dynamics.
Comments are closed for this story.