Grammy Award-winning South African composer Lebo “Lebo M” Morake has filed a $20 million defamation lawsuit against Zimbabwean comedian Learnmore Jonasi, alleging the comedian’s public jokes about the iconic “Nants’ Ingonyama” chant caused cultural harm and unlawful commercial exploitation. The complaint was lodged in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on March 17, 2026.
The legal action stems from remarks Jonasi made during an appearance on the One54 Africa podcast, where he suggested the famous Zulu chant from The Lion King’s opening song “Circle of Life” carries a simplistic, humorous meaning. Speaking with Nigerian-American comedian Godfrey C. Danchimah Jr., Jonasi claimed the phrase translates roughly to, “Look, there’s a lion. Oh my God.”
Lebo M, who co-composed and performed the chant with Elton John and Hans Zimmer, responded emotionally in an Instagram video on March 4. He clarified that “Nants’ Ingonyama” is a profound Royal Praise Chant written in Zulu and Xhosa, reflecting South African heritage, language, and spirituality. “All hail the king. Bow in the presence of the royal family,” he stated, emphasizing its cultural depth.
According to the lawsuit, Lebo M attempted to resolve the matter directly with Jonasi before pursuing legal action. Jonasi, however, posted his own video declining to apologise, asserting his character was attacked and hinting the controversy could promote an upcoming comedy tour spanning Zimbabwe, South Africa, Botswana, Zambia, and Uganda.
Lebo M’s global spokesperson, Tshepo Mboni, framed the lawsuit as a necessary defence of cultural integrity. “’Nants’ Ingonyama’ is not a punchline, nor a casual reference point for exploitation. It is a sacred Royal Praise Chant, rooted in African identity, spirituality and storytelling,” Mboni said. “We are taking a firm and uncompromising stance against any form of misrepresentation, defamation, or unauthorised commercial use that undermines its significance and Lebo M’s legacy.”
The case highlights tensions between comedic expression and the protection of culturally significant artistic works. The chant, integral to one of cinema’s most recognised soundtracks, has long symbolises a powerful connection to African traditions for global audiences. The lawsuit seeks damages for alleged defamation and unjust enrichment, and aims to prevent further unauthorised use of the chant. A court date has not yet been set.
