The Federal High Court in Abuja has set an accelerated timetable for the trial of six individuals accused of conspiring to overthrow President Bola Tinubu’s administration. Justice Joyce Abdulmalik scheduled the commencement of proceedings for 29‑30 April and 4‑5 May, dates that will also accommodate hearings on the defendants’ bail applications.
At the initial hearing, Attorney‑General Lateef Fagbemi informed the court that the prosecution is prepared to proceed and that witnesses are available, subject to the court’s schedule. The counsel for the first accused, Mohammed Ilayepo, indicated that his client’s bail application was ready for consideration. However, Justice Abdulmalik ordered that the trial be conducted before any bail applications would be addressed.
Representatives for the second, third, and sixth defendants raised procedural concerns, noting that the limited preparation time and the complexity of the charges could impede a fair defence. In response, the judge urged all parties to cooperate in agreeing to dates that would facilitate a swift and orderly trial. Following the discussion, the court affirmed the previously announced hearing dates.
The six defendants are alleged to have plotted a coup aimed at destabilising the Tinubu government. While details of the evidence have not been disclosed, the prosecution’s readiness and the availability of witnesses suggest that the case will move forward rapidly. The expedited schedule reflects the judiciary’s intention to address security‑related offences promptly, thereby reinforcing the rule of law and deterring future attempts to subvert constitutional order.
The upcoming hearings will determine whether the accused will be granted bail and will set the stage for the substantive trial. Observers note that the outcome could have broader implications for Nigeria’s political climate, particularly regarding the government’s capacity to confront threats to its stability. The court’s decision to prioritize the trial underscores the judiciary’s role in maintaining public confidence in the legal process amid heightened political sensitivities.
