A recent presidential pardon granted to Maryam Sanda, who was convicted of killing her husband, Bilyaminu Bello, in 2020, has sparked controversy. Initially, President Tinubu pardoned Sanda, along with 174 other convicts, including individuals convicted of drug trafficking, kidnapping, and fraud. However, following public outcry, the President revoked the pardon in a statement issued by his media aide, Bayo Onanuga.

Sanda’s sentence was subsequently reduced to 12 years in prison on compassionate grounds, considering the interests of her children. Islamic cleric Ahmad Gumi has weighed in on the matter, stating that the initial pardon was the correct decision. According to Gumi, Sanda’s display of remorse after the incident, including breaking down in tears over her husband’s body, suggests that her actions were driven by external factors.

Gumi explained that in Islamic law, forgiveness is a vital aspect of justice, and the family of the deceased had already forgiven Sanda. He emphasized that this act of forgiveness is not a sign of weakness, but rather a demonstration of mercy, which is highly valued in Islam. The cleric argued that executing Sanda would not have been an appropriate solution, as justice in Islam is guided by balance and compassion, rather than anger or vengeance.

The case has highlighted the complexities of applying Islamic law in modern justice systems. The concept of forgiveness and mercy is deeply rooted in Islamic teachings, and Gumi’s comments underscore the importance of considering these principles in legal decisions. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the reduced sentence will be received by the public and the legal community.

The presidential pardon and subsequent revocation have also raised questions about the use of executive clemency in Nigeria. The decision to pardon individuals convicted of serious crimes has sparked debate about the role of mercy and compassion in the justice system. As the country navigates these complex issues, it is likely that the conversation will continue, with various stakeholders weighing in on the appropriate balance between justice, mercy, and the rule of law.