Former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan’s potential candidacy for the 2027 presidential election has been addressed by Justice Ayo Salami, a former President of the Court of Appeal. According to Salami, the Nigerian constitution prohibits Jonathan from running for the presidency in 2027. This restriction is based on the constitutional limit of two terms, or eight years, for any individual serving as President.

Salami explained that Jonathan had already completed the remainder of late President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua’s term before winning an election, which would make any further attempt to occupy the office unlawful. He emphasized that if Jonathan were to contest and win the election, the courts would likely nullify the outcome due to the constitutional violation.

In an opinion article, Salami stated that Jonathan’s ambition to contest for the presidency in 2027 is “effectively and undoubtedly shot down.” This assessment is grounded in the constitutional framework that governs presidential terms in Nigeria. The country’s constitution is designed to prevent any individual from serving more than two terms as President, ensuring a peaceful transfer of power and preventing the concentration of power in one person.

The significance of Salami’s statement lies in its implications for Nigeria’s electoral process and the rule of law. If Jonathan were to proceed with his candidacy, it could lead to a constitutional crisis and potentially undermine the legitimacy of the electoral process. As the 2027 elections approach, the issue of Jonathan’s eligibility is likely to remain a topic of discussion and debate among Nigerians and international observers.

In the context of Nigerian politics, the role of the judiciary in interpreting the constitution and ensuring its enforcement is crucial. The courts have previously played a significant role in resolving electoral disputes and interpreting the constitution, and it is likely that they would be called upon to do so again if Jonathan’s candidacy were to proceed. As the situation unfolds, it will be important to monitor developments and assess their implications for Nigeria’s democratic process.