Hamas rejects US backed Gaza resolution plan

The Palestinian militant group Hamas has expressed criticism over a US-backed Security Council resolution aimed at determining the future of Gaza, describing it as an attempt to impose international control over the territory. The resolution, which includes the deployment of an International Stabilisation Force (ISF), has been met with concern by Hamas and other Palestinian groups, who see “dangers” in the proposed draft.

According to Hamas, the resolution’s formulation could lead to external dominance over Palestinian national decision-making, effectively stripping Palestinians of their right to manage their own affairs. The group has emphasized that humanitarian efforts should be administered through competent Palestinian institutions, under the supervision of the United Nations, and based on respect for Palestinian sovereignty and the needs of the population. Hamas has also stressed that aid should not be used to marginalize Palestinian institutions.

Furthermore, Hamas has reaffirmed its rejection of any clause related to disarming Gaza. The United Nations Security Council is scheduled to discuss the situation in the Middle East, over a month after a ceasefire came into force following more than two years of war in Gaza. The US government’s resolution is expected to be on the agenda, with support from regional actors such as Egypt, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Turkey.

The proposed Gaza peace plan, which includes the disarmament of Hamas, also provides for the deployment of international soldiers to stabilize the coastal area and the establishment of a transitional government comprising Palestinian technocrats. Western countries have called for the plan to be secured through a UN Security Council mandate. As the Security Council discusses the resolution, the international community awaits the outcome, which could have significant implications for the future of Gaza and the Middle East peace process. The situation remains complex, with various stakeholders involved, and a negotiated solution will require careful consideration of the concerns and interests of all parties involved.

You may also like

Recent News

Access Denied

Samsung Galaxy A57 vs A37 Review: Key Differences and Features

EU energy bill spikes amid Iran war supply shock – commissioner — RT Business News

EU Fossil Fuel Import Costs Soar Over $587 Million Daily Amid Middle East Crisis

Spain is making its move in China — RT World News

Spain’s Pedro Sánchez deepens China ties with fourth Beijing visit, securing deals and positioning Madrid as EU’s pragmatic bridge to Beijing

Being arrogant is good' - Burna Boy's mom defends son amid backlash

Burna Boy’s Mother Defends Son Amid Arrogance Backlash

Scroll to Top