The All Progressives Congress (APC) in Lagos State has criticized Peter Obi, the 2023 Labour Party presidential candidate, for his comments on the conviction of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB). Obi had described Kanu’s arrest, detention, and sentencing as unfortunate, stating that the process reflected leadership gaps and might heighten tensions rather than reduce them.

Obi’s remarks were made in a statement titled ‘Kanu’s Conviction: Obi Calls for Dialogue, Healing Over Hostility’, which was issued by his media aide, Ibrahim Umar. In response, the Lagos APC spokesman, Seye Oladejo, released a statement on Sunday, saying it was inappropriate for political actors to comment on matters still undergoing judicial review. Oladejo warned against making statements that could be interpreted as undermining national security institutions or court processes.

According to Oladejo, Obi’s comments could be misinterpreted as politicizing a sensitive security issue, and he urged public figures to avoid remarks capable of inflaming public sentiment. The statement emphasized the importance of consistent and balanced engagement when addressing issues of national security and public order, stressing that all parties should respect judicial outcomes while allowing room for lawful appeal and dialogue where necessary.

The APC spokesperson noted that national security matters should not be influenced by political considerations and advised leaders to prioritize unity and stability in their public communication. The Federal Government, Oladejo stated, remains committed to handling issues related to terrorism, treason, and national stability in accordance with the law and the constitution.

The APC’s reaction to Obi’s comments highlights the sensitivity surrounding the conviction of Nnamdi Kanu, which has sparked debate about national security, justice, and political leadership in Nigeria. The case has also raised concerns about the impact of political discourse on the country’s stability and the need for responsible public commentary on matters of national importance. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the various stakeholders will navigate the complex issues at play.