A recent social media altercation involving Bashir and Bello El-Rufai, sons of former Kaduna State governor Nasir El-Rufai, has sparked a national debate about online conduct and the tone of public discourse. The controversy began as a discussion on governance and accountability under the President Bola Tinubu administration but quickly escalated into personal insults and vulgar language.
The exchange started when an X user criticized the arrest of opposition figures, arguing that such actions amounted to political suppression rather than a genuine anti-corruption drive. The conversation took a turn when another user alleged selective justice and questioned why some politicians with pending corruption cases remained untouched by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
Bashir El-Rufai joined the conversation, responding to a question about a viral clip involving former governor of Kano State, Abdullahi Ganduje, allegedly receiving and stuffing United States dollars into his babariga. The debate shifted from policy to personalities, with Bashir’s response drawing a sharp rebuttal and the conversation eventually descending into vulgar territory.
Bello El-Rufai, a serving federal lawmaker, later joined the exchange, denying owning any land and warning that he would “drag” the user publicly if accused again. The post drew immediate backlash for its confrontational tone and references to the user’s mother.
The El-Rufai sons have a history of sparking controversy with their social media posts, with previous incidents involving threats, inflammatory language, and references to other people’s mothers. Despite widespread criticism, they have not faced visible scrutiny under Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act, which criminalizes the transmission of grossly offensive or obscene messages.
The recurring episodes have raised questions about selective enforcement of the law and the conduct of politically exposed individuals online. The El-Rufai brothers’ interventions are amplified instantly, with their words dissected and debated nationwide. While supporters argue that they are private citizens entitled to defend themselves, critics say their actions have consequences and should be held to a higher standard.
The latest clash has reinforced concerns about the tone of public discourse and the need for accountability, particularly among those in positions of power or influence. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether the El-Rufai sons will face consequences for their actions or if the controversy will blow over, as has been the case in the past.