US President Donald Trump has stated that he is guided by his own morality and does not need to follow international law, sparking concerns about the country’s commitment to global norms. This statement comes after a recent military raid against Venezuela and threats to annex Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark.
In an interview with The New York Times, Trump emphasized that his own judgment is the only factor that can restrain him in exercising his powers as commander-in-chief. When asked about the importance of international law, he replied, “My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.” He further stated that he does not need international law, but later clarified that the definition of international law is subjective and open to interpretation.
The US president’s comments have raised eyebrows, particularly in light of recent events. Last Saturday, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro was abducted by American commandos, and Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in acquiring Greenland. On Monday, Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy, Stephen Miller, reiterated that the US should have Greenland as part of its security apparatus.
Denmark has pushed back against these claims, with Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warning that a military attack on another NATO country would have severe consequences. A joint statement from several EU leaders and the UK has also defended Greenland’s status as part of the Kingdom of Denmark.
On Thursday, Trump signed a memorandum suspending support for 66 international organizations, agencies, and commissions, including several UN bodies, that allegedly operate contrary to US national interests. This move has further fueled concerns about the US’s commitment to international cooperation and global governance.
The developments have significant implications for international relations and global security. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the US will navigate its relationships with other countries and international organizations. The US president’s stance on international law and his willingness to challenge established norms have raised questions about the future of global cooperation and the role of the US in international affairs.
