A recent development in Nigerian politics has seen former Kano State Governor, Rabiu Kwankwaso, express support for the potential defection of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf and other New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) office holders to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). This stance was revealed in a video message circulated on social media, where Kwankwaso described the movement as the “Gandujiyya movement” led by former APC national chairman, Abdullahi Ganduje.
According to Kwankwaso, some NNPP members holding elective or appointive offices in the state are being pressured to sign documents indicating their intention to defect. In response, Kwankwaso has advised these members to sign the documents to avoid potential victimization by the state government. This decision was made after consulting with his associates, with the primary goal of easing tension and protecting the well-being of his supporters.
Kwankwaso’s statement highlighted the distress faced by his supporters, with some reportedly experiencing sleepless nights, hospitalization, and emotional strain due to the pressure. He emphasized that this is occurring despite the fact that intense politicking for the 2027 general election has not yet commenced in the state.
The situation in Kano State reflects the complex and often shifting landscape of Nigerian politics. The potential defection of NNPP office holders to the APC could have significant implications for the state’s political dynamics and the upcoming election. As the situation continues to unfold, it is likely that more details will emerge about the motivations behind Kwankwaso’s decision and the potential consequences for the state’s political landscape.
In the context of Nigerian politics, party defections are not uncommon, and the pressure to switch allegiance can be intense. The fact that Kwankwaso has publicly supported the potential defection of his party’s members suggests that the situation in Kano State is complex and multifaceted. As the 2027 general election approaches, it is likely that political maneuvering and alliances will continue to shift, potentially leading to further developments in the state’s political landscape.
