Former Nigerian senator and elder statesman Barnabas Gemade has publicly reaffirmed his active engagement in politics, directly contradicting recent reports suggesting his withdrawal from public life. The clarification was made during the burial ceremony of Baba Kunde Alabesa, the father of Benue State Commissioner for Humanitarian Affairs Ephraim Kunde, held in the state.
Gemade, a prominent figure who represented Benue North-East in the Senate, described the narrative of his political retirement as deliberately fabricated by “mischief makers.” He stated that his function within the political sphere has naturally progressed rather than ceased. “As a party elder, my work now is to offer advice, counsel, and guidance,” he explained, noting that this advisory role, while less publicly visible than constant campaigning, remains a significant and active contribution.
This statement addresses circulating speculation about the veteran politician’s status. Gemade’s career spans decades, including a presidential bid and key roles within the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). His influence, particularly in Benue State’s complex political landscape, has historically been exercised through both direct participation and behind-the-scenes consultation.
By defining his current position as an elder providing strategic direction, Gemade positions himself as a stabilizing figure within his party, leveraging experience rather than seeking elective office. This role is common for senior politicians in Nigeria, where elder statesmen often mediate conflicts and shape policy from advisory capacities.
The public denial serves to quell assumptions about his diminishing influence and signals his intent to remain a relevant voice in Benue and national politics. Observers note that such clarifications from senior figures can impact party dynamics and voter perceptions, particularly in a key state like Benue. His continued involvement underscores the enduring importance of patronage networks and mentorship in the region’s political ecosystem.
No specific timeline for future activities was provided, but his remarks confirm an ongoing, if transformed, commitment to the political process. The episode highlights how narratives of political exit or retirement are frequently contested by the individuals concerned, reflecting the personal and strategic value attached to perceived relevance in the public domain.
