Nigerian Skitmaker Zicsaloma Cites Family Entitlement as Barrier to Financial Independence
Popular Nigerian skitmaker Isaac Aloma, widely known by his online alias Zicsaloma, has publicly attributed delays in achieving his own financial independence to what he describes as an entrenched sense of entitlement among family members. The comedian and content creator made the remarks during a recent video discussion focusing on personal finance and wealth building.
Aloma stated that while he engaged in various business ventures from a young age, many proved unsustainable due to familial financial demands. He argued that this dynamic is particularly acute within many African family structures, where relatives often perceive an individual’s earnings as a shared resource. “The purpose of working is to save money and build a better future,” he noted in the broadcast, “but African family, and even your own family, are very entitled to your wealth.”
His solution is a stance of deliberate financial separation. Aloma insisted that attaining true financial freedom requires establishing strict boundaries, even if those boundaries are perceived as harsh by one’s social circle. “It is very, very okay to be financially heartless even to your friends and family so that you can save up and break that circle,” he said. He acknowledged that this approach would likely provoke disapproval but framed it as a necessary, long-term strategy for personal stability, adding, “They will hate you for it, but trust me, it is for your own good.”
Aloma’s commentary touches on a pervasive socioeconomic challenge in Nigeria and across parts of Africa, where cultural expectations of familial support and collective responsibility can conflict with individual goals of wealth accumulation and asset building. His personal narrative as a self-made digital entertainer who has built a significant following lends a firsthand perspective to this debate. By framing financial prudence as a form of necessary selfishness, he challenges conventional norms around communal sharing, especially concerning money earned by younger generations.
The remarks have sparked conversation online, highlighting the tension between traditional support systems and modern aspirations for financial autonomy. Aloma’s experience suggests that for some, navigating these interpersonal financial pressures is a critical, though often unspoken, component of economic success. His advice underscores a growing discourse on financial literacy that emphasizes boundary-setting as a practical tool for wealth preservation and growth.
Ultimately, Zicsaloma’s story serves as a case study in the complex interplay between personal ambition and cultural obligation. His message advocates for a disciplined, individual-centric approach to finance, positioning rigorous self-protection of capital not as a moral failing, but as a strategic imperative for breaking cycles of dependency and achieving lasting financial security.
