The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has scheduled Nigeria’s 2027 presidential and National Assembly elections for February 20, a date that falls within the Islamic holy month of Ramadan and the Christian Lenten fasting period. The announcement has prompted a range of reactions from religious and legal stakeholders concerning voter participation and electoral inclusivity.
The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) asserted that the Lenten fast has historically not prevented Christian voter participation. Daniel Atori, media aide to the Niger State CAN chairman, noted that general elections have previously been held during Lent, including in 1999, 2019, and 2023. “Christians are not restricted from participating in civic activities during fasting,” he said, urging INEC to be guided by constitutional provisions rather than religious sentiments.
An Islamic cleric in Kaduna, Ibrahim El Mu’azzam, stated that holding elections during Ramadan is not religiously forbidden. However, he acknowledged practical concerns, noting that fasting may reduce physical stamina and energy for long hours at polling units. While predicting only a slight potential decline in turnout, he advised INEC to consult with major Islamic bodies before finalizing timetables to promote wider acceptance.
Legal practitioner Usman Yau clarified that religion is not a legally recognised ground for postponing elections under Nigeria’s Electoral Act 2022. He cited Section 28, which permits delays only for emergencies like natural disasters or widespread violence. Yau acknowledged that holding polls during Ramadan could affect turnout, particularly among women and fasting election officials, raising moral questions about social justice and inclusive participation. However, he noted that the constitutional principle of social justice, while fundamental, is not justiciable in court. He referenced a precedent from the 2003 elections, which were shifted following Christian concerns over an Easter-period date.
A resident in Kano, Zulaihat Danjuma, criticised the decision as culturally insensitive, warning it could disenfranchise Muslim voters and overburden fasting ad-hoc staff like NYSC members.
INEC, through National Commissioner Mohammed Kudu Haruna, acknowledged the concerns and affirmed its timetable complies with constitutional and legal requirements. The commission stated it is undertaking consultations and may seek legislative intervention to address legitimate issues while ensuring any adjustment remains within legal limits. INEC reiterated its commitment to transparent, inclusive, and credible elections.
The debate underscores the challenge of scheduling national polls in a religiously diverse society, balancing constitutional timelines with practical and symbolic considerations for major faith communities. The outcome of INEC’s consultations may set a precedent for managing future electoral calendars amid overlapping religious observances.
