Political analyst Dr Yusuf Serunkuma has reignited debate over Uganda’s anti-corruption efforts, asserting that the campaign against graft is largely driven by political interests rather than purely judicial processes.
Speaking during a televised discussion, Serunkuma pointed to the prosecution of former minister Mary Goretti Kitutu’s junior counterpart, Agnes Nandutu, as an example of how power dynamics shape accountability. “Nandutu was the smaller player, which is why she didn’t survive the sieve; the bigger ones did,” he said, remarks that have since fuelled public discourse.
While acknowledging the need for accountability, Serunkuma questioned the fairness and consistency of the process. “Nandutu’s case doesn’t help us. Fighting corruption is a political project. The courts don’t fight corruption; it is fundamentally political, not judicial,” he argued.
He did, however, accept the legal outcome, stating that Nandutu bore responsibility for her actions. “Nandutu was guilty. I sympathize with her, but she was guilty,” he added.
The comments come amid ongoing national conversations about corruption, accountability, and the role of institutions in enforcing transparency. The Karamoja iron sheets scandal, which implicated several high-ranking officials, continues to draw scrutiny over how cases are handled and who is ultimately held accountable.
Analysts say the debate highlights broader concerns about selective enforcement and the need for stronger, more independent systems to combat corruption effectively. As Uganda continues to grapple with corruption challenges, Serunkuma’s remarks underscore a growing call for reforms that ensure accountability mechanisms are both credible and equitable.
