Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has taken his long-running battle with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to a new arena, filing a lawsuit at the Federal High Court in Abuja that seeks to bar the president from contesting the 2027 presidential election. The suit, brought under the banner of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), hinges on an alleged forgery that has simmered in Nigerian politics for years: the NYSC discharge certificate.
Atiku and his co-plaintiffs argue that the certificate submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) does not belong to the man currently occupying Aso Rock. The document in question, they claim, bears the name “Tinubu Bola Adekunle,” a far cry from the president’s widely known identity, “Bola Ahmed Tinubu.” That discrepancy, they insist, is not a clerical slip but a fundamental flaw that should render Tinubu unfit to stand for office.
The legal filing does not stop at the certificate itself. It takes aim at the very framework governing presidential eligibility, challenging specific provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 that the plaintiffs say were improperly applied in Tinubu’s favor. The court is being asked to rule on whether a candidate whose submitted credentials do not match his official name can legally participate in the next electoral cycle.
This is not the first time Atiku has pressed this issue. The NYSC certificate was a flashpoint in the lead-up to the 2023 election, when similar allegations surfaced and were batted around in courtroom arguments. Now, with an eye on 2027, the former vice president is clearly signaling that he intends to keep the matter alive, forcing the judiciary to take a definitive stance on what constitutes a valid qualification for the highest office in the land.
The suit lands at a time when Nigeria’s political landscape is already charged, with alliances shifting and opposition figures jostling for position. Whether the court will entertain the case on its merits or dismiss it as a rehash of old grievances remains to be seen. But one thing is certain: Atiku is not letting go of this thread, and the coming months will test whether the legal system can untangle a controversy that refuses to fade away.