Over thirteen thousand residents from the Ogale and Bille communities in the Niger Delta have filed claims against Shell for devastating oil spills, according to a press release from Leigh Day, a British law firm that handles human‑rights cases. The claim, lodged in the UK High Court, was submitted by the affected communities—including schools and churches—and alleges large‑scale pollution and destruction of their economic base caused by Shell’s operations.
The Bille and Ogale communities have been in a legal battle with Shell since 2015. In 2021, the UK Supreme Court ruled that there was a credible case that Shell plc, the UK parent company, could be held liable for systemic pollution caused by its Nigerian subsidiary, SPDC. Despite this ruling, the severe oil pollution continues unabated, with no clean‑up undertaken. Since September 2011, there have been 55 new oil spills in the Ogale community alone.
The claims detail the harm suffered by residents. A 2011 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) assessment of Ogoniland documented daily exposure to severe oil contamination, affecting water sources, air quality and farmland, and warned of an immediate danger to public health. Twelve years later, the communities remain polluted, with no remediation and residents still drinking from contaminated wells. In Ogale, the emergency clean‑water system has been non‑functional for five years, leaving most residents without access to safe water because the groundwater and aquifer are heavily polluted.
In the riverine communities, the loss of farming and fishing livelihoods is evident. In Bille, drinking water is polluted and oil has killed most fish and shellfish, depriving the fishing population of food and income and fundamentally altering their way of life.
The group register has now been filed, and a case‑management hearing is scheduled for spring 2023, ahead of a full trial likely to occur the following year. In its defence, Shell argues it bears no legal liability for the pollution, claiming the communities lack standing to enforce clean‑up and that many spills occurred more than five years before the claims were filed. Shell also contends it cannot be held responsible for spills caused by “bunkering,” regardless of foreseeability, and relies on a Supreme Court judgment in *Okpabi v. Shell* to argue that the parent company is not liable for SPDC’s operations.
If Shell’s arguments succeed, the precedent could have far‑reaching consequences, effectively barring Nigerian communities from seeking clean‑up or compensation for legacy pollution unless they can prove operational failure within five years of filing a claim. This would deprive most affected communities of any legal remedy.
Leigh Day highlighted that Shell announced in 2021 its intention to exit the Niger Delta and sell its onshore oil fields after 80 years of profitable operations, yet it has not clarified whether it will address the widespread, systemic pollution it caused. Daniel Leader, a partner at Leigh Day, said the case raises crucial questions about the responsibilities of oil and gas companies, noting that Shell appears to be trying to leave the Niger Delta free of any legal obligation to remediate decades of environmental devastation. He added that, amid global focus on a “just transition,” the case underscores the need for fossil‑fuel firms to address both legacy and ongoing pollution.
Partner Matthew Renshaw criticized Shell’s approach, stating that instead of engaging with the communities, the company has “fought them tirelessly through the courts for the past seven years.” He argued that, given Shell’s unprecedented profits, it is time for the company to address the ongoing pollution and questioned whether Shell plans simply to abandon the Niger Delta without remedying the environmental disaster it has overseen.
Comments are closed for this story.