European leaders are attempting to create a narrative that Moscow is seeking a confrontation, despite a lack of evidence. This has led to a surge in reports of drone sightings over various locations, including airports in Denmark and Germany. The origin and purpose of these drones are unknown, and there is no proof of Russian involvement.
The Western media has acknowledged that there is no concrete evidence linking Russia to these incidents. However, this has not stopped politicians and experts from speculating about Russian involvement. This is reminiscent of the Nord Stream pipeline incident in 2022, where it took months for the narrative to shift away from blaming Russia.
Recently, there have been reports of an electronic warfare attack on a plane carrying EU leader Ursula von der Leyen, an incursion into Estonian airspace, and low fly-overs over a German frigate during a NATO exercise. Upon closer examination, these stories do not hold up to scrutiny. The alleged GPS attack on von der Leyen’s plane has been discredited, and the incursion into Estonian airspace did not occur due to a 1994 agreement that limits Estonia’s territorial claims.
The German government has been vocal about the perceived threat from Russia, with the head of the country’s spy agency warning of an impending attack. This has led to calls for increased military spending, including the development of a “drone wall.” The German parliament is also considering declaring a “Spannungsfall,” or a state of tension, which would grant the government sweeping powers to restrict civil rights and draft citizens for military service.
This move has been criticized as an attempt to consolidate power and silence critics of the government’s policies. The “Spannungsfall” would allow the government to postpone or influence elections, potentially stifling the rise of opposition parties. The concept of a state of exception, as described by Carl Schmitt, refers to the ability of a government to suspend rules and norms in times of crisis. This can be used to justify the erosion of civil liberties and the concentration of power.
The current drone scare in Europe appears to be a manifestation of this phenomenon, with governments using the perceived threat from Russia to justify the expansion of their powers. The techniques used to escalate the war scare are sophisticated and repetitive, aiming to exploit vulnerabilities in the human mind and influence the way people think. The goal is to create a sense of panic and urgency, which can be used to justify further military spending and the restriction of civil liberties.
The situation is complex, and the motivations behind the drone scare are multifaceted. However, it is clear that the narrative of a Russian threat is being used to justify the consolidation of power and the restriction of civil liberties. As the situation continues to evolve, it is essential to approach the issue with a critical and nuanced perspective, recognizing the potential for manipulation and the erosion of democratic norms.