The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has criticized the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) for allegedly betraying President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s trust, despite his efforts to promote religious inclusivity in federal appointments. This development comes after the United States redesignated Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) due to reported genocide against Christians.

According to MURIC’s Founder and Executive Director, Professor Ishaq Akintola, the US decision is “misplaced and distorted,” as it misrepresents the situation in Nigeria. The group attributes the country’s negative image abroad to certain Christian leaders who have petitioned the US government about religious killings in Nigeria. MURIC argues that these leaders have amplified claims of Christian persecution, rather than correcting the “false and misleading narrative.”

The organization expressed disappointment in CAN’s response, expecting the Christian body to act with greater responsibility given its national influence. MURIC noted that President Tinubu has shown goodwill to Christians through key appointments, with over 60 percent of appointments reportedly going to Christians. The group described CAN’s actions as a “stab in the back,” considering the president’s efforts to promote religious inclusivity.

MURIC accused those behind the petitions to the US of disloyalty to the president and the nation, describing their actions as “the mother of all betrayals.” The group argued that while the US may have its own political motives, some Nigerians are responsible for feeding misleading information to American authorities. Professor Akintola emphasized that President Tinubu does not deserve this treatment, given his efforts to promote religious harmony in the country.

The US redesignation of Nigeria as a CPC has significant implications for the country’s international relations and human rights record. The Nigerian government has vehemently denied allegations of Christian genocide, and MURIC’s criticism of CAN highlights the complexities of religious politics in the country. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the Nigerian government and religious leaders will respond to the US decision and work towards promoting religious harmony and inclusivity.