Dr. Ladan Salihu, a prominent member of the All Democratic Congress, has accused the Federal Government of using anti‑corruption agencies to target and intimidate political opponents, warning that justice is being applied selectively. In a recent interview on Daily Trust TV, she argued that the detention of former Attorney‑General Abubakar Malami is unjust because others facing similar allegations have been treated differently based on their political affiliations.
Dr. Salihu pointed to the case of former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello, who remains free despite comparable accusations, suggesting that his ties to the ruling party have shielded him. She also recalled a statement by former APC National Chairman Adams Oshiomhole, which implied that membership in the ruling party often guarantees protection from prosecution. According to Dr. Salihu, this pattern reflects the use of anti‑corruption agencies as tools of coercion and intimidation against opposition figures, casting doubt on the credibility and independence of the anti‑corruption fight.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has been accused of targeting opposition members while leaving prominent ruling‑party figures untouched. Dr. Salihu emphasized that her stance would change only if a high‑ranking member of the ruling party faced similar treatment. The continued detention of opposition figures, contrasted with the lack of accountability for ruling‑party members, raises serious concerns about the fairness and effectiveness of anti‑corruption efforts.
The episode has sparked debate over the role of anti‑corruption agencies in Nigeria and highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in the justice system. Allegations of selective justice and political intimidation have significant implications for the country’s democratic institutions and the rule of law. As the situation unfolds, observers will watch closely how the government responds to these concerns and whether the anti‑corruption drive can be conducted in a fair and impartial manner. The credibility of the anti‑corruption agencies and the government’s commitment to justice and accountability remain under scrutiny both domestically and internationally.
Comments are closed for this story.