The Nigerian Medical Students Association (NiMSA) has opposed the Medical and Dental Practitioners Act (Amendment) Bill, 2022, which would require medical and dental graduates to render five years of service in Nigeria before receiving a full license. The motion’s sponsor, Ganiyu Johnson (APC/Lagos), said the measure aims to curb the mass exodus of medical professionals. The legislation, titled “A Bill for an Act to Amend the Medical and Dental Practitioners Act, Cap. M379, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004…,” seeks to mandate that any Nigeria‑trained medical or dental practitioner practice in the country for a minimum of five years before being granted a full license by the Council, with the goal of making quality health services available in Nigeria.
Nigeria is currently experiencing one of the worst brain‑drain crises in its history, with many domestically trained doctors leaving for better opportunities abroad. The country has the third‑highest number of foreign doctors working in the United Kingdom after India and Pakistan. While the federal government claims brain drain is not unique to Nigeria, the World Health Organization warns that it could undermine the health system and hinder progress toward universal health coverage and health security. A 2023 WHO health‑workforce report identified Nigeria and 36 other African nations as facing the most pressing workforce challenges related to universal health coverage.
In a statement signed by its president, Ejim Egba, NiMSA described the proposed bill as unpatriotic, ill‑timed, and a breach of doctors’ fundamental human rights as enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (as amended). The association argues that the bill seeks to strangle the medical profession. It contends that improving domestic conditions—such as properly equipping hospitals, offering better treatment and remuneration for doctors, and creating a greener “pasture” at home—would more effectively curb the desire to seek opportunities abroad. NiMSA urges Rep. Johnson to focus on medical tourism rather than what it calls “doctor slavery,” emphasizing that the bill does not address the root causes of brain drain.
According to the statement, the primary drivers of emigration are inadequate infrastructure, insufficient and inappropriate remuneration, and poor working conditions. These issues must be resolved to attract and retain healthcare professionals. The association also asserts that the bill violates fundamental human rights by forcing doctors to work in a specific location against their will. It warns that such legislation would discourage students from pursuing medical education in Nigeria, worsening the shortage of healthcare workers.
NiMSA proposes alternative approaches, such as offering optional pathways for medical education: paying the full cost, obtaining student loans, or receiving subsidized education with a contractual obligation to remain in the country for a set period to “pay back” the subsidy. The bill, they argue, fails to recognize that not all doctors benefit from subsidies and that doctors should have the freedom to choose their training and career paths.
Furthermore, NiMSA claims the bill is arbitrary and unconstitutional, infringing on the right to freedom of movement protected by Section 41 of the Nigerian Constitution. In conclusion, the association vehemently opposes the bill in its entirety and calls on the sponsor to withdraw it immediately. NiMSA urges a consultative, collaborative approach with health‑sector stakeholders and government commitment to address the underlying causes of brain drain rather than imposing restrictive legislation.
Comments are closed for this story.