I did not like this content because it appears to be a raw, unedited article that lacks structure, clarity, and concision. Here are some specific issues:

1. Lack of introduction: The article jumps straight into the news without providing any context or background information about the Gaudreau brothers or their significance in the hockey world.
2. Unorganized structure: The article jumps between different topics, such as the funeral plans, the vigil, and the tributes, without a clear narrative or logical flow.
3. Too much repetition: The article repeats some information, such as the details of the vigil, which could be condensed or summarized to make the article more concise.
4. Lack of depth: The article only scratches the surface of the Gaudreau brothers’ lives and careers, without providing any meaningful insights or analysis.
5. Too much focus on quotes: While quotes can be useful, the article relies too heavily on them, which makes it feel like a collection of soundbites rather than a well-crafted news article.
6. Lack of international appeal: The article assumes a level of familiarity with the NHL and the Gaudreau brothers that may not be universal, which could make it less accessible to readers from diverse backgrounds.

To improve this content, I would suggest:

1. Start with a strong introduction that sets the scene and provides context about the Gaudreau brothers and their significance in the hockey world.
2. Organize the article into clear sections or paragraphs that follow a logical flow.
3. Condense or summarize repetitive information to make the article more concise.
4. Add more depth and analysis to provide readers with a richer understanding of the Gaudreau brothers’ lives and careers.
5. Use quotes judiciously to add context and perspective, rather than relying on them as the primary source of information.
6. Make the article more accessible to readers from diverse backgrounds by providing more context and background information about the NHL and the Gaudreau brothers.