A Nigerian public affairs commentator, Mahdi Shehu, has expressed opposition to the suggestion of declaring a state of emergency to address the country’s insecurity challenges. According to Shehu, such a move would be counterproductive and potentially undermine the nation’s democratic process.
Shehu’s remarks were made in response to reports that some retired senior military officers had expressed support for the declaration of a state of emergency, as proposed by former Chief of Defence Staff, General Lucky Irabor. The commentator argued that declaring a state of emergency would not be in the best interest of Nigerians, but rather serve as a means to suspend elections and grant certain individuals greater access to public funds.
Under emergency rule, Shehu noted that those backing the idea would likely gain more influence and have easier access to the national treasury. He warned Nigerians against falling for what he described as a “defeatist plot,” emphasizing the need for citizens to demand good governance, accountability, and true democracy instead.
Shehu stressed that Nigerians should focus on advocating for effective governance, an end to looting, and the protection of lives and properties. He cautioned that if the proponents of emergency rule succeed in their efforts, driven by selfish and greedy motives, the country would risk losing more than just its democratic system.
The commentator’s remarks come at a time when Nigeria is grappling with persistent security challenges, including terrorism and banditry. The calls for a state of emergency have sparked debate about the most effective ways to address these issues, with some arguing that drastic measures are needed to restore stability and security. However, others, like Shehu, are urging caution and emphasizing the importance of upholding democratic principles and promoting good governance.
