The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has confirmed that it has moved beyond the departure of former presidential hopefuls Peter Obi and Rabi’u Kwankwaso, who recently left the party to join the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC).
Speaking on Arise Television’s “Morning Show,” ADC National Publicity Secretary Bolaji Abdullahi described the exit of the two politicians as a “glitch” and said the party has already stabilised and refocused on its core mission. “Our objective remains the same – to halt the steady deterioration of governance in the country and to strengthen multi‑party democracy,” Abdullahi said. “While some members have shifted to other parties and others remain with us, the broader vision of building a strong opposition coalition is still very much alive within the current political dynamics.”
Obi and Kwankwaso’s migration to the NDC was reported as being driven by internal disagreements within the ADC and a series of court disputes. Their exit, however, did not alter the ADC’s strategic direction, according to party officials.
The ADC, a relatively small but vocal opposition force, continues to position itself as a catalyst for democratic renewal, pledging to work with other parties to present a credible alternative to the ruling coalition. The party’s statement signals an attempt to downplay any perception of internal disarray and to reassure supporters that its agenda remains intact.
Analysts note that the shifting allegiances of high‑profile politicians are common in Nigeria’s fluid party system, but the ADC’s swift response may help it retain relevance ahead of upcoming electoral contests. The party has not indicated any further defections and appears focused on consolidating its remaining membership and expanding its influence through coalition‑building efforts.
As the political landscape evolves, the ADC’s ability to maintain cohesion and present a united front will be critical in shaping the opposition’s role in Nigeria’s democracy. Future developments will hinge on how effectively the party can translate its stated objectives into tangible political engagement and whether it can form lasting partnerships with like‑minded parties.
