A Professor of political science, Jibrin Ibrahim, lamented that contemporary Nigerian politics no longer reflects the principles he taught and studied. Speaking on Arise Television’s “Prime Time,” Ibrahim said political parties have become merely conduits for personal power rather than vehicles for democratic governance.
The professor, who has spent decades lecturing on democratic theory, expressed disappointment that the reality of Nigeria’s political landscape diverges sharply from the standards outlined in academic literature. “We grew up believing that democracy followed certain rules and standards, only to discover that much of what happens in reality has little connection to the theories and ideals we studied,” he told the host.
Ibrahim explained that his own education was rooted in classic political science texts that presented a clear framework for democratic conduct. “My personal tragedy is that I read political science that’s fairly classic, and we just assumed that, if you are talking of democratic politics, these are the rules,” he said. He noted that today’s parties often function as instruments for individual ambition, eroding the institutional integrity that scholarly models anticipate.
The professor’s remarks highlight a growing gap between academic expectations and the practice of politics in Nigeria. While scholars continue to emphasize accountability, transparency, and rule‑of‑law, many observers note an increase in patronage, intra‑party contests for personal gain, and a weakening of internal party democracy.
Observers suggest that the disconnect could have long‑term consequences for governance and citizen trust. If parties are perceived primarily as power‑delivery mechanisms, the incentives for policy‑driven competition and constructive opposition may diminish. This, in turn, risks further entrenching clientelism and reducing the space for genuine democratic deliberation.
Ibrahim’s comments come amid broader discussions about political reform and the need to strengthen party structures across Africa. Civil society groups and reform advocates argue that revitalising internal democracy within parties is essential for restoring public confidence and ensuring that electoral outcomes translate into accountable governance.
The professor concluded by urging a re‑examination of how political science is taught and applied, emphasizing that bridging the gap between theory and practice is crucial for the health of Nigeria’s democracy. He called on educators, policymakers, and party leaders to collaborate in restoring the principles that underpin democratic institutions.
The conversation on “Prime Time” underscores a persistent tension between scholarly ideals and political realities, a dynamic that will shape future debates on democratic consolidation in Nigeria and the wider region.
